Carl Sagan: The scientific journalist who wasn´t a journalist
A good scientific
journalist is capable to disseminate science to society in an easy and
interesting way; this permit that people around the world knows many aspects of
research and discover a lot of the answers related to some of most enigmatic
questions. In a certain way, a scientific journalist has the responsibility of
produce knowledge using their abilities of build a bridge between the “common
society” and “scientific society”. In this note, I want to talk about Carl
Sagan, the most important scientific journalist of our time that in fact wasn’t
a journalist.
Carl was born on November
9, 1934, in Brooklyn and he graduated from the University of Chicago, where he
studied planets and explored theories of extraterrestrial intelligence. He worked
with NASA on several projects a he was a very important antinuclear activist.
Many of their work were based in the relation of planets with the space-time inside
the evolution theory, generated by Charles Darwin.
But Carl not only
investigate in his lab and wrote many papers, He was in fact a true visionary
and a true scientific journalist, prove to that, is the interested that he maintain
in dissemination of science through his work with schools and TV. Sagan was the father of TV
series “Cosmos” in 1980, which was reborn on TV in 2014 with
one of their disciple, Neil Tyson. This program was so success that is considerate
one of the most important pieces of science´s communication in history.
Carl Sagan death in
1996, and his legacy was tremendous, not only for the advance in his particularly
area of astronomy, but also for their inclusion in science communication. Prove
that, Carl is called the “Father of scientific journal”, even when he wasn´t
received the title of this career. This teach us that sometimes a person not necessarily
study something to be something.

OMG! I love Cosmos, I think it's really cool that he's brought people the chance to know information that maybe without his intervention would've been harder to come by.
ReplyDeleteI´m not a person very interested in scientific journalism, but you have a point. They simplify that complex language for all people, like a journalist must be. In this moment is where I question, What we need to be a journalist?
ReplyDeleteI just read something about Carl Sagan and It seems to me incredible, thanks for talking about it on your blog.
ReplyDeleteWow, Cosmos it is a great tv show. With my sister we watch the program and we learned about sciences. Now she wants to study physics when she to enter university
ReplyDelete